Jacquelope's Blog aka The Fedora Revolution


STANDING UP FOR MEN'S RIGHTS.

SHOWING ZERO TOLERANCE

FOR MALE BASHING BULLSHIT





BATHING IN MISANDRIST TEARS

AND PISSING ON TRADITIONALIST BIGOTS!!!



400 notes

Neil DeGrasse Tyson Said What He Thinks About Race Now That He's Made It, And Almost Nobody Noticed

glamorousgamine:

lejacquelope:

sapient-wartortle:

bestnatesmithever:

I love listening to this man talk. Watch this brief video in which Tyson answers the stupid question, “are there genetic differences between men and women, which leads to more men becoming scientists?” through the lens of his personal experience as a black person who chose to pursue science.

There is such thing as gender dimorphism. Please look it up.

So women who want to get into astronomy and stuff shouldn’t, because being a woman means they can’t?

Not sure what you mean here.

More like men and women’s different brain structures may result in them preferring different jobs even when presented with all opportunities (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-008-9380-7). It’s not to say that women shouldn’t become scientific researchers and men shouldn’t become pediatric nurses, but if those fields are respectively male- and female-dominated, then it doesn’t necessarily mean something’s wrong with society.

Ok that’s a good point.

But where this is going wrong is that we’re discussing how men and women are different instead of the fact that all of society should be listening to the individual’s desired career and hobby interests regardless of their gender. We should be discussing the issue of society pushing men and women away from hobbies and career interests that don’t fit arbitrary gender roles. Men can be nurses and homemakers and women can be astronomers.

494 notes

thatalbanianguy:

lejacquelope:

thatalbanianguy:

lejacquelope:

We’re a long way from equality. Let’s get to where people have an equal chance before we even discuss the panic over “giving everyone an equal result” because the latter is literally not a thing.
http://getoveryourselflady.tumblr.com/post/82963022976/letsrunaway0-rocprinceray-white-people
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/

Depends on where you go. In the EU, ive heard that they’re thinking of presenting quotas for women in corporations. And besides that, we have extra scholarships to give women to go into STEM fields rather than giving equal amounts of scholarships to both men and women for STEM fields. I agree with the beginning of your post though, we certainly dont have equality of opportunity either yet.

Ah yes, quotas. Point taken.
There has to be a better solution than quotas.

There is definitely no easy answer to this because we’re already starting from a world of inequality. Besides that, it’s clear that people with enough money to support private education will have kids that are far ahead of those who have  public education, unless we somehow bring our public schools up to par with our private schools. That, to me, seems like by far the best way to introduce equality at least as much as we can provide. After all, Genes are a thing and it’s impossible, nor would it be a good idea, to provide the same genes to everyone.

Even if we do that, college educated black men face higher unemployment than college educated white men - they can’t even compete against white men with criminal records because white employers prefer them over black men without criminal records. (See the cite above.)
We could send every black kid to a private school and wipe out the mentally deleterious effects of poverty and they would gain perhaps an inch or so up the socioeconomic ladder. Because their problems aren’t due to education…

thatalbanianguy:

lejacquelope:

thatalbanianguy:

lejacquelope:

We’re a long way from equality. Let’s get to where people have an equal chance before we even discuss the panic over “giving everyone an equal result” because the latter is literally not a thing.

http://getoveryourselflady.tumblr.com/post/82963022976/letsrunaway0-rocprinceray-white-people

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/

Depends on where you go. In the EU, ive heard that they’re thinking of presenting quotas for women in corporations. And besides that, we have extra scholarships to give women to go into STEM fields rather than giving equal amounts of scholarships to both men and women for STEM fields. I agree with the beginning of your post though, we certainly dont have equality of opportunity either yet.

Ah yes, quotas. Point taken.

There has to be a better solution than quotas.

There is definitely no easy answer to this because we’re already starting from a world of inequality. Besides that, it’s clear that people with enough money to support private education will have kids that are far ahead of those who have  public education, unless we somehow bring our public schools up to par with our private schools. That, to me, seems like by far the best way to introduce equality at least as much as we can provide. After all, Genes are a thing and it’s impossible, nor would it be a good idea, to provide the same genes to everyone.

Even if we do that, college educated black men face higher unemployment than college educated white men - they can’t even compete against white men with criminal records because white employers prefer them over black men without criminal records. (See the cite above.)

We could send every black kid to a private school and wipe out the mentally deleterious effects of poverty and they would gain perhaps an inch or so up the socioeconomic ladder. Because their problems aren’t due to education…

(Source: genopp)

4,076 notes

mr-cappadocia:

So… this woman sexually assaults this guy, clearly. He’s begging, pleading, demanding she stop.

She doesn’t stop.

She grabs his hand and stuffs it in her crotch. He recoils.

Insert False Allegation: THE FUCKING CAB DRIVER IS ARRESTED.

Let that sink in… The fucking CAB DRIVER ended up getting arrested when the lawyer in question. Yeah… that’s right… SHE’S A FUCKING LAWYER… accused him of blackmailing her.

He was summarily arrested.

There was no proof he actually blackmailed her. None. The Police never even bothered to verify her claims. At all. They just straight up fucking arrested the CAB DRIVER and threw him in jail.

When it became apparent there was no proof of blackmail whatsoever, and the whole “She’s fucking sexually assaulting him on the fucking tape the police are holding in their hands” she managed to get charged with something.

What did she get charged with?

Simple assault. I shit you not.

WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?!?

(via it-goes-both-ways)

258 notes

thatalbanianguy:

mankindglobalmedia:

manwithoutahat:

mankindglobalmedia:

manwithoutahat:

logical-user:

kookerus-speaks:

neverendinginquiry:

kookerus-speaks:

the-evil-conservative:

kookerus-speaks:

because he poisned his girlfriend and couild be considered practicing medicine w/out a license. it was her baby and her right to choose. if we want our rights, ending lives before they begin isnt the way to go about it. violence is not the answer

This is the biggest hole in the pro-choice argument. The status of the fetus either as a human being or a clump of cells depends on how the pregnant person feels.

no, being pro choice doesnt mean “hey we can poison you and it’s ok”

Being pro choice is saying “Your baby is only a human if it’s convenient for you. If it isn’t convenient, then it’s just a clump of cells so feel free to kill it.” Yet, if harm is done by anything or anyone other than the mother, then the fetus is magically transformed into a full fledged person with rights and the one doing harm is seen as having assaulted a normal person. Funny that. Either a fetus is a human or it isn’t. You can’t relegate it to a murky, circumstantial and subjective grey area.

he POISONED her. i have explained this so many times today. HE. POISONED. THE. MOTHER.
that is not okay

I am pro-choice all the way, but he poisoned her (as the above user is trying to get through your thick skull). What part of that are you not getting, idiot? 

He wasn’t charged with poisoning or battery. He was charged with MURDER. A clump of cells is not a person. Any feminists who call him a murderer is a complete hypocrite.

He was not convicted on a murder charge:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2547135/Fertility-doctors-son-gave-girlfriend-pill-woman-sentenced-14-years-jail.html
And the “clump of cells” is in the stream of human development, making it therefore human. 

Whether or not a fetus is a person is pretty much a matter of opinion, and aside from my main point.
And please, he plead guilty to tampering with a consumer product and mail fraud, and got 13 years? The absolute maximum sentence? People are treating him like a murderer. Including feminists. Which I find absolutely hypocritical, regardless of my personal belief about abortion.
They say that it’s not a person, but then act like this man committed the ultimate crime? It seems to me that a baby IS a person in their eyes. Just as long as the mother wants it. Think about that. Personhood in their eyes, is not conferred by some objective standard, but by the capricious and mercurial whims of the woman carrying it. That’s fucked up.

But then again, Feminists feel the need to re-define:
*Rape
*Objectification
*Misogyny
*Domestic Violence
*Discrimination
and a host of other things to suit their purposes. It should be no surprise they want to re-define human life as well.

Feminists. Gotta love em!

thatalbanianguy:

mankindglobalmedia:

manwithoutahat:

mankindglobalmedia:

manwithoutahat:

logical-user:

kookerus-speaks:

neverendinginquiry:

kookerus-speaks:

the-evil-conservative:

kookerus-speaks:

because he poisned his girlfriend and couild be considered practicing medicine w/out a license. it was her baby and her right to choose. if we want our rights, ending lives before they begin isnt the way to go about it. violence is not the answer

This is the biggest hole in the pro-choice argument. The status of the fetus either as a human being or a clump of cells depends on how the pregnant person feels.

no, being pro choice doesnt mean “hey we can poison you and it’s ok

Being pro choice is saying “Your baby is only a human if it’s convenient for you. If it isn’t convenient, then it’s just a clump of cells so feel free to kill it.” Yet, if harm is done by anything or anyone other than the mother, then the fetus is magically transformed into a full fledged person with rights and the one doing harm is seen as having assaulted a normal person. Funny that. Either a fetus is a human or it isn’t. You can’t relegate it to a murky, circumstantial and subjective grey area.

he POISONED her. i have explained this so many times today. HE. POISONED. THE. MOTHER.

that is not okay

I am pro-choice all the way, but he poisoned her (as the above user is trying to get through your thick skull). What part of that are you not getting, idiot? 

He wasn’t charged with poisoning or battery. He was charged with MURDER. A clump of cells is not a person. Any feminists who call him a murderer is a complete hypocrite.

He was not convicted on a murder charge:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2547135/Fertility-doctors-son-gave-girlfriend-pill-woman-sentenced-14-years-jail.html

And the “clump of cells” is in the stream of human development, making it therefore human. 

Whether or not a fetus is a person is pretty much a matter of opinion, and aside from my main point.

And please, he plead guilty to tampering with a consumer product and mail fraud, and got 13 years? The absolute maximum sentence? People are treating him like a murderer. Including feminists. Which I find absolutely hypocritical, regardless of my personal belief about abortion.

They say that it’s not a person, but then act like this man committed the ultimate crime? It seems to me that a baby IS a person in their eyes. Just as long as the mother wants it. Think about that. Personhood in their eyes, is not conferred by some objective standard, but by the capricious and mercurial whims of the woman carrying it. That’s fucked up.

But then again, Feminists feel the need to re-define:

*Rape

*Objectification

*Misogyny

*Domestic Violence

*Discrimination

and a host of other things to suit their purposes. It should be no surprise they want to re-define human life as well.

Feminists. Gotta love em!

(Source: cafe-sin-leche)

18 notes

sjwhypocrisy:

lejacquelope:

eliminativism:

lejacquelope:

sjwhypocrisy recently posted this racist bullshit to justify stereotypes about black people.
This kind of Stormfront-level bullshit is what makes people recruit into SJW’ism. Smooth move you self-hating prick.

I read that exchange as it happened and I have to voice my disagreement.
sjwhypocrisy made the mistake to assume that this picture was made by black people when it probably originated in racist circles (at least that’s what I assume). Maybe they mistook the rethoric of black civil righs activists who say that black in the US have to work better together. One could interpret the image that way.
Most importantly, they never said that they endorsed this, they brought the picture up as an example of stereotypes, since you two were arguing about stereotpyes and how they are formed. And then you went right over to accuse them of being a neo-nazi.

Context.
This was in the context of saying that black people who don’t fit stereotypes do not get harmed by stereotypes. When I kept pointing out legions of examples of why this argument is wrong, they just ignored it.
Millions… millions of hard working, even highly educated black people in America, like me, have to endure the consequences of stereotypes about black people, and this person insists that we don’t.
Sjwhypocrisy basically tried to outright deny what we’re going through. They tried to completely erase the countless black people being stopped and frisked in New York for no other reason but they’re black or hispanic. Driving while black, flying while Muslim… in the any community that deals with discrimination on the level that black people do, saying stereotypes don’t harm those who don’t fit the stereotype are fighting words.
People like sjwhypocrisy are going to be on the wrong end of shit when these communities get sick of being discriminated against and decide to take serious action.

Lol what. Im sorry but its just silly to deliberately lie about something in some sad about to gain support.
If you really want people to agree with you maybe try telling the truth. Because passing off your deliberate misunderstanding as me being racist comes of as very cowardly.

I did not lie about you. You said that black people who don’t fit stereotypes do not get harmed by stereotypes. Now own up to your bullshit.
I don’t understand how you got past my block, troll, but let’s try this again. I don’t want to listen to your racist nonsense anymore. I don’t want to, and I do not have to, because idiots like you are already the laughingstock of the black community.

sjwhypocrisy:

lejacquelope:

eliminativism:

lejacquelope:

sjwhypocrisy recently posted this racist bullshit to justify stereotypes about black people.

This kind of Stormfront-level bullshit is what makes people recruit into SJW’ism. Smooth move you self-hating prick.

I read that exchange as it happened and I have to voice my disagreement.

sjwhypocrisy made the mistake to assume that this picture was made by black people when it probably originated in racist circles (at least that’s what I assume). Maybe they mistook the rethoric of black civil righs activists who say that black in the US have to work better together. One could interpret the image that way.

Most importantly, they never said that they endorsed this, they brought the picture up as an example of stereotypes, since you two were arguing about stereotpyes and how they are formed. And then you went right over to accuse them of being a neo-nazi.

Context.

This was in the context of saying that black people who don’t fit stereotypes do not get harmed by stereotypes. When I kept pointing out legions of examples of why this argument is wrong, they just ignored it.

Millions… millions of hard working, even highly educated black people in America, like me, have to endure the consequences of stereotypes about black people, and this person insists that we don’t.

Sjwhypocrisy basically tried to outright deny what we’re going through. They tried to completely erase the countless black people being stopped and frisked in New York for no other reason but they’re black or hispanic. Driving while black, flying while Muslim… in the any community that deals with discrimination on the level that black people do, saying stereotypes don’t harm those who don’t fit the stereotype are fighting words.

People like sjwhypocrisy are going to be on the wrong end of shit when these communities get sick of being discriminated against and decide to take serious action.

Lol what. Im sorry but its just silly to deliberately lie about something in some sad about to gain support.

If you really want people to agree with you maybe try telling the truth. Because passing off your deliberate misunderstanding as me being racist comes of as very cowardly.

I did not lie about you. You said that black people who don’t fit stereotypes do not get harmed by stereotypes. Now own up to your bullshit.

I don’t understand how you got past my block, troll, but let’s try this again. I don’t want to listen to your racist nonsense anymore. I don’t want to, and I do not have to, because idiots like you are already the laughingstock of the black community.

18 notes

janusblackthorne:

lejacquelope:

eliminativism:

lejacquelope:

sjwhypocrisy recently posted this racist bullshit to justify stereotypes about black people.
This kind of Stormfront-level bullshit is what makes people recruit into SJW’ism. Smooth move you self-hating prick.

I read that exchange as it happened and I have to voice my disagreement.
sjwhypocrisy made the mistake to assume that this picture was made by black people when it probably originated in racist circles (at least that’s what I assume). Maybe they mistook the rethoric of black civil righs activists who say that black in the US have to work better together. One could interpret the image that way.
Most importantly, they never said that they endorsed this, they brought the picture up as an example of stereotypes, since you two were arguing about stereotpyes and how they are formed. And then you went right over to accuse them of being a neo-nazi.

Context.
This was in the context of saying that black people who don’t fit stereotypes do not get harmed by stereotypes. When I kept pointing out legions of examples of why this argument is wrong, they just ignored it.
Millions… millions of hard working, even highly educated black people in America, like me, have to endure the consequences of stereotypes about black people, and this person insists that we don’t.
Sjwhypocrisy basically tried to outright deny what we’re going through. They tried to completely erase the countless black people being stopped and frisked in New York for no other reason but they’re black or hispanic. Driving while black, flying while Muslim… in the any community that deals with discrimination on the level that black people do, saying stereotypes don’t harm those who don’t fit the stereotype are fighting words.
People like sjwhypocrisy are going to be on the wrong end of shit when these communities get sick of being discriminated against and decide to take serious action.

Wow, it sure is easy to talk about FIGHTING WORDS when you’re talking about someone behind their back you retarded shitter lmao
Top it off with passive aggressive threats like “you’re going to be on the wrong end of shit”. Drizzle with “WAAAH I’M SO OPPRESSED MEMEMEMEMEME” as you whine about inane bullshit using your internet connection in your house with electricity.
Aaah, social justice whiners.

White men like you get punched out on a regular basis for talking shit like

er, wait, you never say this bullshit to anyone’s face. You’re just a pimple faced wuss trying to jump bad. You probably had to wait in line at the library to get a chance to spout this nonsense because if you got caught doing it at home your parents would stop changing your diapers for a day as a punishment.
You pathetic retard, shut the fuck up.

janusblackthorne:

lejacquelope:

eliminativism:

lejacquelope:

sjwhypocrisy recently posted this racist bullshit to justify stereotypes about black people.

This kind of Stormfront-level bullshit is what makes people recruit into SJW’ism. Smooth move you self-hating prick.

I read that exchange as it happened and I have to voice my disagreement.

sjwhypocrisy made the mistake to assume that this picture was made by black people when it probably originated in racist circles (at least that’s what I assume). Maybe they mistook the rethoric of black civil righs activists who say that black in the US have to work better together. One could interpret the image that way.

Most importantly, they never said that they endorsed this, they brought the picture up as an example of stereotypes, since you two were arguing about stereotpyes and how they are formed. And then you went right over to accuse them of being a neo-nazi.

Context.

This was in the context of saying that black people who don’t fit stereotypes do not get harmed by stereotypes. When I kept pointing out legions of examples of why this argument is wrong, they just ignored it.

Millions… millions of hard working, even highly educated black people in America, like me, have to endure the consequences of stereotypes about black people, and this person insists that we don’t.

Sjwhypocrisy basically tried to outright deny what we’re going through. They tried to completely erase the countless black people being stopped and frisked in New York for no other reason but they’re black or hispanic. Driving while black, flying while Muslim… in the any community that deals with discrimination on the level that black people do, saying stereotypes don’t harm those who don’t fit the stereotype are fighting words.

People like sjwhypocrisy are going to be on the wrong end of shit when these communities get sick of being discriminated against and decide to take serious action.

Wow, it sure is easy to talk about FIGHTING WORDS when you’re talking about someone behind their back you retarded shitter lmao

Top it off with passive aggressive threats like “you’re going to be on the wrong end of shit”. Drizzle with “WAAAH I’M SO OPPRESSED MEMEMEMEMEME” as you whine about inane bullshit using your internet connection in your house with electricity.

Aaah, social justice whiners.

White men like you get punched out on a regular basis for talking shit like

er, wait, you never say this bullshit to anyone’s face. You’re just a pimple faced wuss trying to jump bad. You probably had to wait in line at the library to get a chance to spout this nonsense because if you got caught doing it at home your parents would stop changing your diapers for a day as a punishment.

You pathetic retard, shut the fuck up.

494 notes

thatalbanianguy:

lejacquelope:

We’re a long way from equality. Let’s get to where people have an equal chance before we even discuss the panic over “giving everyone an equal result” because the latter is literally not a thing.
http://getoveryourselflady.tumblr.com/post/82963022976/letsrunaway0-rocprinceray-white-people
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/

Depends on where you go. In the EU, ive heard that they’re thinking of presenting quotas for women in corporations. And besides that, we have extra scholarships to give women to go into STEM fields rather than giving equal amounts of scholarships to both men and women for STEM fields. I agree with the beginning of your post though, we certainly dont have equality of opportunity either yet.

Ah yes, quotas. Point taken.
There has to be a better solution than quotas.

thatalbanianguy:

lejacquelope:

We’re a long way from equality. Let’s get to where people have an equal chance before we even discuss the panic over “giving everyone an equal result” because the latter is literally not a thing.

http://getoveryourselflady.tumblr.com/post/82963022976/letsrunaway0-rocprinceray-white-people

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/

Depends on where you go. In the EU, ive heard that they’re thinking of presenting quotas for women in corporations. And besides that, we have extra scholarships to give women to go into STEM fields rather than giving equal amounts of scholarships to both men and women for STEM fields. I agree with the beginning of your post though, we certainly dont have equality of opportunity either yet.

Ah yes, quotas. Point taken.

There has to be a better solution than quotas.

(Source: genopp)

400 notes

Neil DeGrasse Tyson Said What He Thinks About Race Now That He's Made It, And Almost Nobody Noticed

sapient-wartortle:

bestnatesmithever:

I love listening to this man talk. Watch this brief video in which Tyson answers the stupid question, “are there genetic differences between men and women, which leads to more men becoming scientists?” through the lens of his personal experience as a black person who chose to pursue science.

There is such thing as gender dimorphism. Please look it up.

So women who want to get into astronomy and stuff shouldn’t, because being a woman means they can’t?

Not sure what you mean here.

494 notes

We’re a long way from equality. Let’s get to where people have an equal chance before we even discuss the panic over “giving everyone an equal result” because the latter is literally not a thing.
http://getoveryourselflady.tumblr.com/post/82963022976/letsrunaway0-rocprinceray-white-people
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/

We’re a long way from equality. Let’s get to where people have an equal chance before we even discuss the panic over “giving everyone an equal result” because the latter is literally not a thing.

http://getoveryourselflady.tumblr.com/post/82963022976/letsrunaway0-rocprinceray-white-people

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/12/3394871/ryan-poverty-inner-city/

(Source: genopp, via thatalbanianguy)

309 notes

dumblr-feminist:

sapient-wartortle:

septemberxyzx:

if you aren’t a feminist you’re literally a rapist  ԅ(≖‿≖ԅ)  ԅ(≖‿≖ԅ)  ԅ(≖‿≖ԅ)  ԅ(≖‿≖ԅ)

What is wrong with you.

Wait wait so I’m a rapist? But I’m a woman and women can’t rape right? Or is it just FEMINISTS can’t rape now?

3 notes

TRADITIONALIST BULLSHIT ALERT!!!! -----> Kirsten Dunst Thinks Casting Couch Victims 'Court That Stuff'

I FUCKING TOLD Y’ALL SO!!!!!!!!!!

I FUCKING TOLD Y’ALL SO!!!!!!!!!!

KIRSTEN DUNST is a fucking traditionalist shitbag in the very shitbag sense of the word I told you so I told you so I told all of you so

Now she’s escalating to blaming victims of sexual harassment.

Fuck this idiot. I hope I never see her in another movie again.

Filed under traditionalism rape sexual harassment feminism men's rights mra women's rights male victims male victims of rape egalitarian Kirsten Dunst

21,649 notes

Everything we feared about communism - that we would lose our houses and savings and be forced to labor eternally for meager wages with no voice in the system - has come true under capitalism.

Jeff Sparrow (via sinidentidades)

If you lost your house and savings or are working for meager wages under capitalism…

Under socialism and communism we’re all equally working for meager wages and we have lost all our property to the government.  This Jeff Sparrow sounds like a dumbass.

(via redbloodedamerica)

You mean all the janitors and farm workers out there that suffer like this have done it to themselves?

redbloodedamerica, you’re the dumbass here. GTFO with your neo-Calvinist “if they’re poor it’s all their fault” bullshit.

Jeff Sparrow is right and stop dancing around it.

By the way neither Socialism, Communism nor Capitalism are viable societal models. Did that ever cross your mind?

And finally I leave you with this:

“…everyone but an idiot knows that the lower classes must be kept poor, or they will never be industrious.”

—Arthur Young; 1771

(Source: anticapitalist, via 23claw)

Filed under conservatism socialism capitalism communism republicans