Jacquelope's Blog aka The Fedora Revolution






1 note

Vlogger Laci Green Controversy & Death Threats, Explained

Who the fuck are these people threatening her?

Filed under laci green

18 notes

theoneandonlymrscrowley asked: I find a common trait of radical-anythings is that they often refuse to be wrong. Ever. It's just one of the many reasons that being a radical is *probably* a bad call. I could be wrong, though.


Very wise observation, Mrs. Crowley.

I recall the debate between Bill Nye (the science guy) and the head of the department of Christian Science or some such.

Point is the mediator asks “What would change your mind.”

The christian scientist says “nothing”

Bill Nye says  ”Evidence.” 

That is the sign of a wise man, or woman, or whatever. 

1,461 notes

Anonymous asked: "killed for being black" there's more black on white murders than vice versa per capita. Heck, there's more black on black murder than white on black murder in both absolute and per capita terms. Stop bitching and get your own fucking house in order.



I would ask to a link to your stats but I literally don’t care, you don’t have any, and that’s beside the point. Are any of those white people being killed for being white? Again, are any of those white people being killed for being white? Literally no… like what dimension of earth are you in if you just typed back what i said verbatim and still didn’t understand it?

These are things that don’t just happen to black people, but specifically happen to them because they are Black, because of systemic racism… Now, you make a similar list of murders and violence and humiliation happening to white people because of their racial position in this country, because of racism, that are reflective of any racial subordination they have in this country— i will wait…



Filed under fact bomb

1,952 notes







HEAR HEAR! and especially MEN!!! they dont get enough respect






I love how, rather than take these women’s criticisms into consideration, feminists feel like they have to mock and belittle any woman who doesn’t adhere to their ideology. It’s really nice to see just how condescending feminists actually are to their fellow women. I know you assume we’re all ignorant fools who just don’t understand what feminism is, but actually that’s a problem, because we do.

First of all, this is how your current feminist movement looks right now.











Sure, these are probably what you’d call “misandrists” just giving a bad name to feminism. You’re right, I’m willing to look past all that and actually look at what feminism is really about.

So let’s first look at some quotes from some prominent intellectual feminists throughout history

"I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." — Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.

"I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire." — Robin Morgan

"To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo." — Valerie Solanas, Authoress of the SCUM Manifesto

"The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness…can be trained to do most things." — Jilly Cooper, SCUM

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." — Andrea Dworkin

"Q: People think you are very hostile to men. A: I am." — Andrea Dworkin

"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience." - Catherine Comins

"All men are rapists and that’s all they are" — Marilyn French, Authoress

"The annihilation of a woman’s personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality." — Andrea Dworkin

"Men love death. In everything they make, they hollow out a central place for death, let its rancid smell contaminate every dimension of whatever still survives. Men especially love murder. In art they celebrate it, and in life they commit it. They embrace murder as if life without it would be devoid of passion, meaning, and action, as if murder were solace, stilling their sobs as they mourn the emptiness and alienation of their lives."
— Andrea Dworkin 

"Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure, accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the earth, called it ‘Her’. Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human imagination."
— Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women 

"On the Left, on the Right, in the Middle; Authors, statesmen, thieves; so-called humanists and self-declared fascists; the adventurous and the contemplative, in every realm of male expression and action, violence is experienced and articulated as love and freedom."
— Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women. 

"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist — Ti-Grace Atkinson

”Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice.” — Ti-Grace Atkinson

"Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear" — Susan Brownmiller; Authoress of Against Our Will p.6

"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression." — Sheila Jeffrys

"Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated." — Catherine MacKinnon 

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." — Catherine MacKinnon

"You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs."
— Catherine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.) 

Interesting stuff. But hey, let’s look at what feminism is doing today in our modern times.

First let’s start with the wage gap. Feminists have been reciting this issue for quite some time now. Women still making 77¢ for every $1 men do for the same job??? Now that is a real problem.

Wait, except it’s not?

In 1963, President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act, which stated the following:

I AM delighted today to approve the Equal Pay Act of 1963, which prohibits arbitrary discrimination against women in the payment of wages. This act represents many years of effort by labor, management, and several private organizations unassociated with labor or management, to call attention to the unconscionable practice of paying female employees less wages than male employees for the same job. This measure adds to our laws another structure basic to democracy. It will add protection at the working place to the women, the same rights at the working place in a sense that they have enjoyed at the polling place.

This Act granted working women the same rights as that of the working man, thereby enjoying the right to equal pay.

Next year, Congress passed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in which Section 703(a) defines the following employer practices as unlawful:

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Essentially banning discrimination of wages based on sex.

So wait, why are all these companies so eager to commit an unlawful act by paying women less? How are they getting away with it?

Well… maybe they aren’t getting away with it - because they’re not committing the unlawful act.

Here is a comprehensive look at the wage gap issue, prepared for the government specifically, 95 pages.


Here are some by women



US Department of Labor


The Gender Pay Gap is a Complete Myth


Gender pay gap is not what activists claim


Equal pay statistics are bogus because they don’t compare like with like


Fair Pay Isn’t Always Equal Pay


The Wage Gap Myth


Don’t Blame Discrimination for Gender Wage Gap


The pay inequality myth: Women are more equal than you think


Women Now a Majority in American Workplaces


Labor force participation rate for men has never been lower.


Share of Men in Labor Force at All-Time Low


Women In Tech Make More Money And Land Better Jobs Than Men


Female U.S. corporate directors out-earn men: study


Female CEOs outearned men in 2009.


Women between ages 21 and 30 working full-time made 117% of men’s wages.


According to the U.S. Census Bureau, single women between 22 and 30 years old earn an average of $27,000 a year. That’s 8% more than comparable men.


Workplace Salaries: At Last, Women on Top


Young Women’s Pay Exceeds Male Peers


The 15 Jobs Where Women Earn More Than Men


women aged between 22 and 29 earn over £10 per hour on average, compared to men their same age who earn just under this amount.


Young women now earn more than men in UK


The only chairwoman in the FTSE 100 index of biggest British companies, when asked about government efforts to force companies to make at least 25% of board member to be female said: “there’s no real evidence to suggest women being on a board makes the companies any better – what we’re doing here is forcing an experiment.”

This was further supported in the book “Why Men Earn More” by Warren Farrell, Ph.D., examined 25 career/life choices men and women make (hours, commute times, etc.) that lead to men earning more and women having more balanced lives, and that showed how men in surveys prioritize money while women prioritize flexibility, shorter hours, shorter commutes, less physical risk and other factors conducive to their choice to be primary parents, an option men still largely don’t have. That is why never-married childless women outearn their male counterparts, and female corporate directors now outearn their male counterparts.


Farrell also lists dozens of careers, including fields of science, where women outearn men. Women simply have more options than men to be primary parents, and many of them exercise that option rather than work long, stressful hours. That is why 57% of female graduates of Stanford and Harvard left the workforce within 15 years of entry into the workforce.


This is an option few men have (try being a single male and telling women on the first date that you want to stay home).

Blaming men for women’s choices is unfair. In fact research shows most men have no problem with their wives outearning them.


Research also shows most working dads would quit or take a pay cut to spend more time with kids if their spouses could support the family.


Research also shows that parents share workloads more when mothers allow men to be primary parents.


ABC News: “Is the Wage Gap Women’s Choice? Research Suggests Career Decisions, Not Sex Bias, Are at Root of Pay Disparity”


There is also the myth that women are kept out of certain more lucrative fields by sexism. The truth is that women stay away from math out of their own free choice


Women In Science: No Discrimination, Says Cornell Study


Let’s be real about the lack of women in tech


Here are some by women 



US Department of Labor


Hmm, it appears as though the wage gap is not quite the issue that feminists have made it out to be.

Okay, that’s fine. But what about rape culture? Rape is a serious crime, make no mistake. But does our culture promote it? That’s a different question.

Here’s what RAINN (Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network) has to say about it.


RAINN has officially dismantled feminist rape culture hysteria.

But what about the statistic that says 1 in 4 women will be raped or sexually assaulted in her lifetime?



IF the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportionsNo crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent. The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely.

— Heather Mac Donald, "The Campus Rape Myth".

This alleged “statistic” was culled from a survey of 3,000 college women in 1982, conducted by Ms. Magazine.  These women were asked only three questions:

  1. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?
  2. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man threatened or used some degree of physical force to make you?
  3. Have you had sexual acts when you didn’t want to because a man threatened to use some degree of physical force to make you?

The trouble is, many of the women the survey counted as “victims” did not actually feel that they had been raped, especially not the entire third of the alleged “victims” that continued to have a consensual sexual relationship with their supposed attacker.  Others that had consensual one-night-stands that they later regretted were also counted as “victims”. 

When you have to lie about the prevalence of a crime, you’re not doing women any favors.

Feminism is supposed to be empowering, not to send us cowering.

Rape is not the “epidemic” that people are trying to claim it is.  It has actually decreased dramatically in the past few decades - up to 80% since 1979despite an increase in the willingness of victims to report them.  This is even further supported by data directly from the U.S. Bureau of Justice.

The only thing that HAS been increasing are FALSE reports of rape, which do a lot more harm to the lives of others than you may want to believe.

Third wave feminism is operating under far too many logical fallacies.  The Big Lie Technique is readily apparent in the use of the very “statistic” above which has time and again been proven to be false.  Overgeneralization continually tries to paint all men as monsters, when science has shown us that there are many psychological and biological factors that come into play to create someone with the potential to commit violence

If you have to spread lies to support your cause, how much of a cause could you possibly have to begin with?  And what are you saying about femininity itself when you want so badly for us to live in constant fear?

How is this supposed to be encouraging women to be strong if all you let us aspire to is to be victims?

How is this encouraging women to be independent if you try to make us believe that we can’t take care of ourselves?

How are you helping women at all if you have to lie to us?

Okay, but let’s not forget the rampant misogyny that became apparent in our culture after the Elliot Rodger incident. 

Just saw this on my Facebook feed and I’m really quite upset. What is this collective mentality accomplishing? What are you trying to prove? That men are all bad? Honestly, I want someone to tell me what spreading this idea is accomplishing.

The crimes that have been committed by sick individuals are horrible, no one is arguing that. But is this type of stereotyping really a good way to reflect on society? Is it good to use isolated incidences to further your agenda? If so, then these incidences would also make it clear that there is a huge problem of female perpetrated violence in society as well.








Comedian Phil Hartman was murdered by his wife on May 27th 1998


NFL player Steve McNair was murdered by his girlfriend on July 4th, 2009


John Wayne Bobbitt had his penis cut completely off on June 23rd, 1993


Travis Alexander was murdered by Jodi Arias on June 4th, 2008


Andrew Bagby was murdered by Shirley Jane Turner on November 6th, 2001 (She later murdered their 1 year-old son on August 18th, 2003)



Brenda Spencer killed two and injured nine at Cleveland Elementary School on January 29th, 1979


Laurie Dann killed one boy and injured five others at Hubbard Woods Elementary School on May 20th, 1988


Jennifer San Marco killed eight people at Goleta postal facility on January 30th, 2006


Sylvia Seegrist killed three and injured seven during a shooting spree at a Springfield mall on October 30th, 1985


Mary Ann Holder killed five children including her own son in Pleasent Gardens, NC on November 20th, 2011


Jullian Robbins killed one and injured two at Penn State on September 17th, 1997


Heather Smith killed two then committed suicide at Spanaway Junior High School on November 26th, 1985


Latina Williams killed two others then self at Louisiana Technical College on February 8th, 2008


Amy Bishop Anderson killed three and wounded three others at the University of Alabama on February 12th, 2010


.Wow, almost like violence is not so much a gendered issue and is more of a human issue,. Maybe instead of using tragedies to push an agenda and demonize an entire gender, we should focus on the real problem of violence as a whole.
But to recap, let’s look at what real feminism has done in the real world.

Men want protection against false rape allegations. They feel that a man’s life should not be ruined simply on the allegation of a woman who may be a vindictive liar. Currently, a woman can accuse a man of rape for no reason, and the man’s name is splashed in the paper and his life is ruined. So, they fought for laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged.

Feminists fought against this, causing it to fail. Also see here, the London Feminist Network campaigning to defeat the proposal.

Men want an end to the justice system favoring women simply because they are women, and giving men harsher sentences simply because they are men.

Feminists fought against this, arguing that no woman should be sent to jail, even women who had murdered multiple people.

Men want equal treatment when victims of domestic violence, and to not be arrested for the crime of “being male” under primary aggressor policies.

Feminists fought against this by trying to suppress evidence showing that half of domestic violence is done by women, by threatening the researchers with bomb threats, death threats, etc. Modern, younger feminists are doing it as well.

The feminist definition of domestic violence has skewed arrest and prosecution philosophies, resulting primarily in having only male batterers criminally pursued.

Men want female rapists to be arrested, charged, and convicted with rape. In Western countries, women are rarely punished when raping men, due to the biased legal system. In some countries, women cannot be punished when raping men, since rape is defined as a male-perpetrated crime.

Feminists fought against this in India, arguing that “there is a physicality [in] rape” and that it would make things “more complicated for judges.”

Feminists fought against this in Israel, claiming that changing the law would result in men filing false rape claims.

Men don’t want to be thrown in jail because they lost their jobs and temporarily cannot pay child support.

Feminists fought against this, trying to lower the amount to $5000 before a man is guilty of a felony for not paying child support. If a man loses a decent-paying job, he will now be a felon, go to jail, lose his right to vote, AND be unable to find future jobs—if he cannot regain an equal-paying job within a few months.

Men want equal economic support and help from the government. When the recession hit, male-dominated fields like construction lost millions of jobs, while female-fields like education and healthcare gained jobs. So the government proposed an economic stimulus for those fields.

Feminists successfully fought against this, arguing that it was discrimination to support men, and caused the government to give money to women who didn’t deserve it. Hundreds of professional feminists complained against the “sexism” of helping men (who had lost jobs) and not women (who had gained jobs).

A representative of the Michigan National Organization for Women testified in opposition to the Revocation of Paternity Act, which stopped the old law which stated that if a woman was married and cheated on her husband, the resulting child is considered to be legally the husband’s and the biological father had no legal rights to fight for custody or parenting time with his biological child.

In 2008, a law was passed in England and Wales that allowed long-term domestic violence victims who killed their abuser to be charged with the lesser charge of manslaughter, but this only applies to women

In California and Montana, a woman can name any man she likes as the father, he gets a letter in the mail, if he does not prove he isn’t the father within 30 days he is now the father and must payHe cannot contest it. And DNA tests to prove paternity are not considered proof by the courts.

Women who falsely accuse a man of rape, who would be sent to prison for 10+ years if convicted, only gets fined or a slap on the wrist.

There is also the gender bias in the Probation Departments:

A higher score on the Probation Assessment Tool (PAT) means a recommendation that could lead to eventual dismissal of charges. A lower score means probation or lockup, not to mention the juvenile delinquent tag. [Judge] Hunt claims PAT routinely rewards girls with 14 extra points for gender alone, while boys get 0. 

Then there are studies that show women who fail to pay child support are incarcerated only 1/8th as often as men with similar violations.

The feminist definition of domestic violence has skewed arrest and prosecution philosophies, resulting in having mostly male batterers criminally pursued, and female batterers left alone.

Men who are falsely accused of rape can have their names published and their lives ruined even if they are not convicted or charged - their accuser is protected and is likely to face no punishment, or a light one.

And you seriously wonder why women don’t want to be a part of the feminist movement?

You know we’re not idiots, Laci. We’ve done our research. We know what feminism is about. I’m sorry you can’t accept women thinking individually for themselves and not agreeing with everything you say.

I guess this lady was right,

i-was-a-teenage-anarchist:    kiran4equality:    Most brilliant anti-feminist quote I have read to date.    And it’s from Christina Sommers, a feminist who has said again and again how she hates what feminism has become.

(via check-your-privilege-feminists)

25 notes

Anonymous asked: Your responses to people who don't give two shits about circumcision makes you sound like a feminist, just saying.


I have to wonder why people wouldn’t “give two shits” about the fact that our society is mass-mutilating infant boys for no other reason than they think it looks better or because they’re religion says so.

Seems kind of strange.

13 notes

If a feminist ever said “let’s hack Facial Abuse” I’d hand her the keyboard to do it.

If you’re not hip to the porn scene, or you’re offended by the discussion, then ignore this, there’s a lot of inside jargon here. However, you might want to read on, because this isn’t about porn - it’s about exploitation and stuff that borders on rape, or actually is rape. And no one is doing anything to police this stuff. People don’t mind talking on Tumblr about the nonconsent and mockery of BDSM that 50 Shades of Grey is - well, focus your gaze on this monstrosity, because it is much worse.

Facial Abuse is a porn site that corrupts BDSM to its lunatic fringe extreme and glorifies abusing the hell out of women. If you think 50 Shades of Grey is bad, this porn site is all that and to a much worse degree. Right down to the fact that in many scenes you see women (usually unable to speak at the moment) clearly signaling for the guy to stop doing what he’s doing and they do not stop. When she wants to quit the scene, she’s pressured by a bunch of other men standing around. Although these women purportedly sign contracts, they aren’t always let in on what happens in those scenes. Many come in without knowing what goes on, as in they haven’t really seen what Facial Abuse is about. Think of an 18 year old Chinese worker going to work for Foxconn for the first time, or an 18 year old American on their first day of work at a tobacco farm. Facial Abuse fuels its operations with young, naive women. One telltale sign of how bad it is: more than one woman has starred in a Facial Abuse episode and then quit porn. 

While outright rape is an extreme charge to levy against Facial Abuse and would be tough to prove in court, there’s no doubt that it caters to naked misogyny. The scenes they produce are all about choking, slapping, gagging her until she vomits… if it’s about abusing a woman, it’s in these videos. Of course there are those Men in Pain videos which go to the same extreme, but again the difference is you can see in many Facial Abuse episodes that it’s gone too far and she wants it to stop. The company is fueled by the influx of young and naive women. They don’t have a full idea of what they’re getting into. And some quit the entire industry after that traumatic experience. No informed consent, no safewords, no failsafes, no aftercare. As I said… like 50 Shades of Grey, but worse.

Oh and Roosh “Return of Kings” V loves Facial Abuse. I’ll leave the reader to figure out why this is downright damning.

In contrast, the network of porn sites called Kink.com does many of the same extreme things that Facial Abuse does, but the big difference is that they’re all about consent and respecting limits. In fact, another telltale comparison is that many Facial Abuse fans say Kink.com is fake. No doubt because the air of consent is obvious with Kink.com. 

What can you do about Facial Abuse? You can let your politician know what’s going on here. Porn stars are working class people and like other working class people, they should know what they are getting into. Short of that, you can at least raise awareness.

Please see more here:





Filed under porn kink.com rape non-consent consent abuse porn facial abuse misogyny feminism men's rights mra egalitarianism

12 notes

Anonymous asked: whats going on with assassins creed? All I know is a new trailer came out but I dont see how its mocking women


Some SJWs on Tumblr are accusing Ubisoft of only just now revealing Elise as a way of making amends after the shitstorm that blew up a little while ago when females were confirmed to not be playable in co-op, which angered the oppressed women on here whose greatest issue is being forced to play as a man in a video game.

I’ve seen more than one person claim it’s mocking the upset fans because Ubisoft is adding a (presumably) cookie cutter female character after that announcement. They’re automatically assuming Elise will be Arno’s love interest and that, inevitably, she’ll die to further the plot.

It’s the typical bullshit spewed by women on this website who gripe about representation in video games yet have precisely 0% interest in becoming a contributing member of the video game industry.

Sigh. The SJWs are right on this one. There’s some, but not a lot of female playable characters in Co-Op in general, although this situation is rapidly improving: which means Ubisoft’s stupidity is even greater in magnitude. Ubisoft’s rationalization to this was the worst logic in the universe: that female characters are harder to make. One only needs to look at Gearbox’s Borderlands series, Bethesda Softworks’ Elder Scroll series and EA / Bioware’s Mass Effect series (among others they’ve done) to know they’re either full of shit at Ubisoft, or horrifyingly incompetent. The fact that Ubisoft threw in Elise ultimately shows their excuse was bullshit. I doubt even they’d be downright stupid enough to make Elise - supposedly a playable character - die to further the plot, though. I mean, damn, killing someone’s love interest is the cheapest CLICHE’D move in the universe. Even a piece of shit company like Ubisoft can do better than that.

As for having 0% interest in becoming a contributing member of the video game industry… who knows if that is true anymore.

Just because Anita Sarkeesian is a fraudulent feckless fucktard doesn’t mean she and her gang of misguided SJWs weren’t wrong on this issue.